Nick Jackson’s practice focuses on representing clients in complex litigation matters in federal and state courts, including the defense of class action lawsuits. He has represented clients in matters involving federal privacy statutes, constitutional privacy rights, intellectual property, contractual disputes, and federal and state securities laws. He also assists clients in responding to formal investigations and informal inquiries from federal and state regulators, as well as handling demands for user data from law enforcement and private litigants. In addition, Nick has counseled clients on the privacy, intellectual property, and litigation-related aspects of significant commercial transactions.
Prior to joining ZwillGen, Nick was an associate at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. While at Cravath, Nick advised and represented clients in a variety of litigation matters, including complex securities class actions and copyright and trademark-related disputes. Nick also counseled clients on intellectual property and privacy issues in connection with mergers, acquisitions and other significant commercial transactions, including drafting and negotiating patent, trade secret and trademark licenses and conducting IP due diligence. Nick also has prior experience at a public interest organization litigating a variety of civil rights cases, with an emphasis on matters involving the privacy of personal and medical information and censorship.
Nick received his law degree from The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas, graduating with High Honors. While in law school, Nick served as the Texas Law Review’s first-ever Online Content Editor.
A New Jersey federal court has dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit against multiple “smart TV” manufacturers alleging that their televisions improperly collect information on what customers are watching on their screens. The ...Read More
Following the D.C. Circuit’s narrowing of the FCC’s broad definition of an autodialer in its 2015 Omnibus TCPA Declaratory Ruling and Order (“Omnibus Order”), the Third Circuit has ...Read More
- In-App Purchases of Virtual Gaming Chips May Violate Washington Gambling Law
- What Google’s Fight Against A Canadian Injunction Could Mean for The “Right to Be Forgotten”
- Protecting the Right to Criticize: How the Consumer Review Fairness Act May Require Changes to Your Online Terms
- Supreme Court Decrees Statutory Violation Alone Is Not Enough to Confer Standing