Jacob regularly represents companies in privacy and security-related litigation. He has served as lead counsel for major internet companies and magazine publishers in defending actions brought under the Michigan Video Rental Privacy Act, and communications platforms in class action litigation under the California Information Privacy Act. Jacob was the lead outside counsel on Pandora’s victory in the Michigan Supreme Court defeating claims under the Michigan Video Rental Privacy Act.
He has also engaged in extensive investigations of hacking, employee misconduct, bribery, embezzlement, fraud and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, with an emphasis on working with investigators to understand and use computer forensic evidence to uncover wrongdoing, interview witnesses, and prepare practical remediation plans.
Jacob holds an active security clearance and is one of the rare private attorneys that has appeared before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court more than once (on behalf of Yahoo and as co-counsel to appointed amicus Marc Zwillinger). He likewise has represented numerous communications platforms and internet companies in litigation involving requests for user data in the United States and across the world.
Prior to joining ZwillGen PLLC, Jacob obtained litigation and appellate experience at major firms in Washington, DC and Columbia, SC, including appeals before the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, as well as the South Carolina Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court. Jacob has worked on trial teams in a number of federal district courts in DMCA litigation, a rare trial involving the Alien Tort Claims Act, and securities class actions.
While at Vanderbilt Law School, Jacob received the Founder’s Medal for graduating first in his class.
In United States v. Moore-Bush, the First Circuit recently reversed a Massachusetts District Court decision finding that the Fourth Amendment prohibited sustained video surveillance conducted using a pole-mounted camera in a public space. The Court ...Read More
In a surprisingly result-oriented analysis, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has reversed its view on the scope of the Wire Act, declaring that the Wire Act is not limited to sports gambling. The opinion authored ...Read More
- Summary of Supreme Court’s Decision in Carpenter v. United States
- Podcast: Data Do, Data Don’t
- What Should Attorneys Do at Border Crossings to Protect Client Information?
- When is a Warrant for Email Content Too Broad?
- It’s Time to Re-Register your DMCA Agent
- Do Trump’s Automatically Recurring Donations Violate the Law?
- Highlights from the Newly Declassified FISCR Documents
- Court Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in Google Gmail Privacy Class Action