We believe the existing hourly law firm model is outdated and misaligns the interests of lawyers and their clients. Law firms should be rewarded for helping clients efficiently solve problems and discouraged from spending more time than necessary to achieve the same result. That’s why we have alternative pricing models. On every matter, our goal is to find the right pricing structure to align our incentives with your success.
We handle all of the legal work in a given area or subject matter for a monthly retainer, which we can adjust upward or downward as the work ebbs and flows.
Under this model, we take the risk that we have underestimated the time that needs to be spent. If it takes longer, you still don’t pay any more. If we are very efficient, we get the benefit of our efficiency.
Even in the simplest matters, like creating Terms and Conditions for a website, you know how to measure success, and we want to deliver that result. Accordingly, you pay us a reasonable rate or fee for the work and agree on an additional fee to be paid if we are successful, however you decide to define it.
Because we work collectively to solve your problems, nearly all of our lawyers are available for the same rate, except our Fellows. Our Fellows are one or two years out of law school and we bill them at less than half the price of an experienced attorney. They are perfect for those legal tasks you don’t want to pay a 20-year legal veteran to do, but that are more sophisticated than what a paralegal should be doing.
On October 10, 2019, the California Attorney General issued its notice of proposed rulemaking containing its proposed CCPA Regulations. In many instances, the draft Regulations go beyond simply clarifying existing CCPA provisions and ...Read More
Key Takeaways: Subject data rights for employee data and business-to-business data were narrowed (for a year). The definition of personal information was clarified; the toll-free number requirement has an exception. The definition of sale remains ...Read More
- Ninth Circuit Rules that Scraping a Public Website is Likely Not a CFAA Violation
- YouTube and Google Fined $170 Million for COPPA Violations; FTC to Investigate YouTube Channels Next
- ZwillGen Ranked in Chambers USA for 9th Consecutive Year
- FTC Says Unroll.me Deceived Consumers on Access and Use of Information
- The Carrot and The Stick: Trends and Considerations in the Equifax/FTC Settlement
- Now Accepting Applications for 2020 Fellowship Program
- New York Becomes Fifth State to Define a Breach to Include “Access” to Information
- ZwillGen’s FTC Team on the Meaning of the FTC Facebook Settlement